Use this tool to see exactly how a window changes physical size when moved between monitors with different resolutions. A 1920×1080 window fills an entire Full HD monitor but only a quarter of a 4K screen — and the physical dimensions shift because pixel density varies with screen size. Add up to three monitors, pick a content window size, and watch the real-time size comparison. Whether you're choosing between a 27-inch 1440p and 4K, wondering how your app will look on a client's display, or planning a multi-monitor setup with mixed resolutions, this tool shows you the answer before you buy.
Resolution scaling describes how the same pixel-defined content — a window, an app, a game — maps to different physical sizes on different monitors. A 1920×1080-pixel window is always 1920 pixels wide, but how wide that is in centimeters depends entirely on the monitor's pixel density (PPI). On a 24-inch Full HD monitor at 92 PPI, that window fills the entire screen and measures about 53 cm wide. On a 27-inch 4K monitor at 163 PPI, the same window occupies just 25% of the screen area and measures only 30 cm wide — nearly half the physical size. This difference is invisible in screenshots but dramatic in person. Resolution scaling matters every time you move a window between monitors, connect a laptop to an external display, or design an interface that needs to work across hardware.
The physical width of any on-screen content is calculated by dividing its pixel width by the monitor's PPI (pixels per inch). A 1920-pixel-wide window on a 92 PPI monitor is 1920 ÷ 92 = 20.9 inches (53.0 cm) wide. The same 1920-pixel window on a 163 PPI monitor is 1920 ÷ 163 = 11.8 inches (29.9 cm) wide — nearly half. PPI itself is a function of three values: horizontal resolution, vertical resolution, and diagonal screen size. Two 27-inch monitors — one 1440p, one 4K — have very different pixel densities despite being the same physical size. The 1440p panel packs 109 PPI while the 4K panel reaches 163 PPI, so every pixel on the 4K screen is smaller, and every window shrinks proportionally.
Physical width = pixel width ÷ PPI
| Monitor | Window | Physical Size | Coverage | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27" 1080p (92 PPI) | 1920×1080 | 20.9" × 11.8" (53.0 × 29.9 cm) | 100% | Window fills the entire screen — pixel-for-pixel match. |
| 27" 1440p (109 PPI) | 1920×1080 | 17.6" × 9.9" (44.8 × 25.2 cm) | 56.3% | Noticeably smaller. UI elements shrink but more desktop space is visible around the window. |
| 27" 4K (163 PPI) | 1920×1080 | 11.8" × 6.6" (29.9 × 16.8 cm) | 25.0% | Only a quarter of the screen. Text may be too small to read without OS scaling. |
| 32" 4K (138 PPI) | 1920×1080 | 13.9" × 7.8" (35.4 × 19.9 cm) | 25.0% | Same pixel coverage as 27" 4K, but physically larger thanks to the bigger panel. |
| 34" UW 1440p (109 PPI) | 1920×1080 | 17.6" × 9.9" (44.8 × 25.2 cm) | 41.9% | Same PPI as a 27" 1440p — window is the same physical size, but more horizontal space surrounds it. |
Upgrading monitors
Moving from a 27-inch 1080p to a 27-inch 4K shrinks every window to one-quarter its previous area unless you enable OS scaling. Understanding this before buying prevents the shock of unreadably small UI on day one.
Multi-monitor setups
In a mixed-resolution setup (e.g., a 4K main + 1080p side monitor), dragging a window between screens causes it to jump in size. A 1000-pixel-wide window might be 6 cm on the 4K screen but 11 cm on the 1080p panel. This is normal but disorienting if you're not expecting it.
App and web development
Designers need to know how their UI looks at real-world physical sizes, not just pixel dimensions. A button that's comfortably tappable at 44px on a phone may be tiny on a 4K desktop monitor. Testing across PPIs reveals usability issues that screenshots miss.
Game streaming and recording
If you stream at 1920×1080 on a 4K monitor, the capture window is physically small — just 30 cm wide on a 27-inch panel. Some streamers prefer 1440p monitors where the 1080p stream window is more proportionally sized and easier to preview.
Presentations and screen sharing
Content designed on a high-PPI display may appear much larger when projected or shared to a low-PPI screen. A slide layout that looks clean on your 4K monitor could overflow the visible area on a 1080p projector.
How a standard 1920×1080 window compares across popular monitor configurations. All measurements assume no OS scaling — this is the raw pixel-to-physical mapping.
27" 1080p → 27" 1440p
Window goes from filling the entire screen (100%) to 56% of screen area. Physical width drops from 53 cm to 45 cm. Text remains readable without scaling.
27" 1080p → 27" 4K
Window occupies only 25% of screen area. Physical width drops from 53 cm to 30 cm. Most users need 125-150% scaling to keep UI readable.
27" 1440p → 32" 4K
Despite the larger panel, the higher resolution shrinks the window. Physical width drops from 45 cm to 35 cm. Less dramatic than same-size upgrades.
24" 1080p → 27" 1080p
Same resolution, bigger screen — everything gets physically larger. The window is the same pixel count but 27% more area. PPI drops from 92 to 82, making pixels slightly more visible.
27" 4K → 42" 4K OLED
Same resolution, much larger panel. A 1920×1080 window goes from 30 cm to 46 cm wide. The 42-inch OLED at 105 PPI makes 4K content feel similar to a 27-inch 1440p in physical size.
34" UW 1440p → 49" DQHD (32:9)
Both have 1440 vertical pixels. A 1920×1080 window is the same physical height on both, but the 49-inch gives 5120 px of horizontal space vs 3440 — room for an extra full window beside it.
Modern operating systems use DPI scaling to keep UI elements at readable physical sizes regardless of resolution. Without scaling, a 4K monitor would make everything microscopic. With scaling, the OS renders at a higher resolution internally, then maps it to the physical pixels — trading pixel-perfect sharpness for usability.
Windows applies a system-wide scale factor that multiplies the logical resolution. At 150% scaling on a 4K (3840×2160) monitor, the OS behaves as though the screen is 2560×1440 logical pixels — same effective desktop space as a native 1440p monitor, but rendered with 4K crispness. Apps that support DPI awareness scale cleanly; legacy apps may appear blurry because Windows stretches their output. The recommended scaling for each resolution: 100% for 1080p/1440p, 125% for 27" 4K, 150% for 24" 4K, 200% for small/high-DPI panels.
macOS uses a fundamentally different approach: HiDPI pixel doubling. On a 5K display (5120×2880), macOS renders at exactly 2× — the logical resolution is 2560×1440, and four physical pixels back each logical pixel. This produces razor-sharp text and UI. For 4K displays, macOS offers "scaled" modes that render at non-integer multiples, which are slightly less sharp than native 2× but still far better than LoDPI. macOS does not support the fractional scaling steps Windows offers (125%, 175%), which is why 1440p monitors look noticeably worse on Macs — they fall between HiDPI and LoDPI with no good scaling option.
GNOME supports 100% and 200% natively, with experimental fractional scaling (125%, 150%, 175%) via Wayland. KDE Plasma handles fractional scaling more gracefully, though some X11 apps may still appear blurry. The Linux scaling landscape is improving rapidly, but mixed-DPI multi-monitor setups — where each monitor has a different scale factor — remain a pain point compared to Windows and macOS.
The right scaling level depends on your monitor's native PPI and your personal preference. Higher scaling makes UI elements larger and more readable but reduces effective desktop space. These recommendations aim for comfortable text size at typical desk viewing distances (60-80 cm).
| Monitor | Scaling | Effective Res | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24" 1080p (92 PPI) | 100% | 1920×1080 | Native 1:1 mapping. Text is comfortable at arm's length. The standard baseline. |
| 27" 1080p (82 PPI) | 100% | 1920×1080 | Pixels are visible on sharp text but scaling down would lose too much space. Some users prefer to stay at 1080p and sit slightly further back. |
| 27" 1440p (109 PPI) | 100% | 2560×1440 | The sweet spot. Comfortably sharp at arm's length without any scaling needed. 33% more desktop space than 1080p. |
| 27" 4K (163 PPI) | 150% | 2560×1440 | 150% gives you 1440p-equivalent workspace with 4K sharpness. 125% is sharper but text may be small for some users. |
| 32" 4K (138 PPI) | 125% | 3072×1728 | The larger panel tolerates lighter scaling. 125% gives significantly more space than 150% while keeping text readable. |
| 34" UW 1440p (109 PPI) | 100% | 3440×1440 | Same PPI as 27" 1440p — no scaling needed. The extra width provides more horizontal workspace rather than physical enlargement. |
| 42" 4K OLED (105 PPI) | 100-125% | 3840×2160 or 3072×1728 | The lower PPI means 100% is usable if you sit at 80+ cm. At normal desk distance, 110-125% is more comfortable. |
Add up to three monitors from the preset dropdown — the database includes common sizes from 24-inch Full HD to 49-inch super ultrawides. Choose a content window size from presets (Full HD, QHD, 4K) or enter custom dimensions. The visualization shows each monitor at proportional physical size with the content window rendered on the active monitor. Stats cards below show the exact physical dimensions, PPI, screen area percentage, and whether the window fits within each monitor's resolution. Switch between macOS and Windows chrome styles, toggle imperial or metric units, and share your configuration via a URL. The tool is particularly useful for comparing how the same app or game window will appear when you're shopping for a new monitor or planning a mixed-resolution multi-monitor setup.
Because the 4K monitor has four times as many pixels packed into the same physical area. Each pixel is physically smaller, so a 1920×1080 window — which covers every pixel on a 1080p screen — only uses 25% of the pixels on a 4K screen. Fewer pixels means less physical space. This is why OS scaling exists: it renders your UI at a higher internal resolution so elements stay at readable sizes.
Almost always, yes. Without scaling, a 27-inch 4K monitor at 163 PPI makes text, icons, and UI elements roughly half the physical size they'd be on a 1080p monitor. Most people find 125-150% scaling comfortable — you get sharper rendering than a native 1440p or 1080p panel while keeping UI elements at readable sizes. The sweet spot depends on your eyesight and viewing distance.
The window keeps its pixel dimensions but changes physical size because the two monitors have different pixel densities (PPI). On the higher-PPI monitor, the window appears smaller; on the lower-PPI monitor, it appears larger. With OS scaling enabled, the operating system may also rescale the window's contents, which can cause a brief redraw as the window adjusts to the new scale factor.
A 27-inch 1440p at 109 PPI works beautifully at 100% scaling — sharp text, no scaling artifacts, and good desktop space. A 27-inch 4K at 163 PPI is sharper but requires 150% scaling for comfortable reading, which gives you the same effective desktop space as 1440p. The 4K advantage is crisper text and images, especially noticeable in small font sizes and photo editing. The 1440p advantage is simpler setup (no scaling needed) and lower GPU requirements.
A 42-inch 4K OLED has a pixel density of about 105 PPI — close to a 27-inch 1440p monitor at 109 PPI. Since the physical size of UI elements is determined by PPI, text and windows appear at similar physical sizes on both, despite the 42-inch panel being much larger overall. The 42-inch just has far more desktop space surrounding each window.
Games render at whatever resolution you set in their graphics settings, independent of your monitor's native resolution. Running a game at 1080p on a 4K monitor means the game window will be small (25% of screen area in windowed mode) or the GPU will upscale it to fill the screen (in fullscreen mode), which looks softer than native resolution. For the sharpest image, match the game resolution to your monitor's native resolution — but this requires a more powerful GPU at higher resolutions.
Resolution scaling refers to how a fixed-pixel-size window maps to different physical sizes across monitors with different PPIs — it's a physics relationship. Display scaling (or DPI scaling) is an OS feature that multiplies the logical resolution to keep UI elements at readable physical sizes. They're related but distinct: resolution scaling is what this tool visualizes, while display scaling is the OS's response to it.
Yes — add up to three monitors and compare how the same content window appears on each. This is especially useful for mixed-resolution setups (e.g., a 4K main monitor with a 1080p side monitor) where dragging windows between screens causes size jumps. The tool shows you exactly how large those jumps will be, helping you decide whether to match resolutions or adjust OS scaling to minimize the difference.